AutoStakkert! review: free planetary, lunar and solar stacking
Where does it rank on my leaderboard
| Rank | Software | Stars for Your Buck | Recorded UK price |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stellarium | 100 out of 100 | Free |
| 2 | GraXpert | 99 out of 100 | Free |
| 4 | SharpCap | 95 out of 100 | £14 |
| 8 | AutoStakkert! | 86 out of 100 | Free |
| 9 | PHD2 | 85 out of 100 | Free |
| 12 | StarXTerminator | 81 out of 100 | £45 |
| 13 | ASIStudio | 79 out of 100 | Free |
| 16 | DeepSkyStacker | 71 out of 100 | Free |
| 17 | Adobe Photoshop | 67 out of 100 | £22 |
Contents
- 01 Where does it rank on my leaderboard
- 02 Specifications and features
- 03 A walk through AutoStakkert!
- 04 Raw against finished
- 05 Should you buy it?
- 06 Questions and more about this review
In 30 seconds
Stars for Your Buck 86/100
Reviewed 2 Nov 2026 Updated 2 Nov 2026
- Rank
- #8 of 17 software
- Verdict
- Damon's pick
Written by Damon Scotting 3 min read
Buy it if
- You film the planets, the Moon or the Sun and want one sharp image from the video.
- You want the sharpest frames picked for you, for nothing.
- You have outgrown RegiStax and want finer control of the stack.
Skip it if
- You image galaxies and nebulae: it is made for videos of bright targets, not long deep-sky exposures.
- You are on a Mac or Linux and do not want to run Windows software through Wine.
“Planetary stacking is a different universe from deep sky stacking, and AutoStakkert! shows it. Back then you watched hours of YouTube tutorials just to get the basics. But once it clicks, the jump from raw video to finished planet is mind-blowing. I have lost count of the times I looked at a raw Jupiter video and could barely make out the Great Red Spot, only to watch three thousand frames become a crisp image with distinct coloured bands and sharp moons. It is one of the core apps every astrophotographer needs, and it is free. I started with RegiStax, but I get better, more finely tuned results from AutoStakkert!.”
Specifications and features
Against the stacking software I have reviewed
Compare with
| AutoStakkert! reviewed #8 of 17 | RegiStax #15 of 17 | ASIStudio #13 of 17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recorded UK price | Free | Free | Free |
| Stars for Your Buck | 86/100 | 77/100 | 79/100 |
| Made by | Emil Kraaikamp | Cor Berrevoets (the Netherlands) and the RegiStax 6 development team | ZWO (Suzhou, China) |
| Price | Free for private, non-commercial use | not recorded | not recorded |
| What it is for | Aligning and stacking videos of the planets, the Moon and the Sun | Aligning, stacking and processing images | Planetary and deep-sky capture, live stacking and stacking |
| Licence | Freeware for private, non-commercial use; a business must register and buy a licence | not recorded | Free download |
| Operating systems | Windows (64 bit); macOS and Linux only through Wine | Windows (.exe installers); no Windows version named | Windows (64 and 32 bit), macOS, Linux |
| Current version | 4.0.13 beta (19 Feb 2025); 4.0.11 (21 Jan 2024) is the stable build | 6.1.0.8 (6 May 2011), an update to RegiStax 6.1 | 1.22 |
| Saves the stack as | TIF, PNG or FIT | not recorded | not recorded |
A walk through AutoStakkert!
Open the video Open the video and two windows appear: the controls on the left, the frames on the right. Mine is a partial solar eclipse, filmed as a SER video.
Choose the stabilisation Planet (COG) for a small disc, Surface for the Moon or a close-up of the Sun. Then press Analyse and it grades every frame.
The quality graph The quality graph sorts the frames from sharpest to softest. I kept the best 30 percent; analysis and stacking took about ten seconds.
Alignment points Alignment points let each part of the disc line up on its own. I placed two, on the sunspot groups, before stacking.
Raw against finished
Should you buy it?
The 1 target, the unprocessed side against my finished image, each with its integration, the camera and the palette:
- Partial solar eclipse: The sharpest 30 percent of the video's frames of light, the stack straight out of AutoStakkert!, before colour and sharpening
86/100 Stars for Your Buck
Pros
- “I get better, more finely tuned results from AutoStakkert! than I did from RegiStax.”
- It is free for private, non-commercial use.
- It grades every frame and draws a quality graph, so only the sharpest part of the video goes into the stack.
- Alignment points let each patch of the disc line up on its own, which undoes the wobble of the air.
- Fast: my eclipse video was analysed and stacked in about ten seconds.
Cons
- “The first time I opened it, it felt like alien software built for my own hobby, and I had no idea what I was doing.”
- Windows only: on a Mac or Linux it runs through Wine, with no native version planned.
- It stacks and stops there: the colour and the final sharpening of my eclipse happened after the stack.
- The newest build, 4.0.13, is labelled a beta; 4.0.11 is the one called reasonably stable.
It is one of the core apps every astrophotographer needs, and it is free.
Who the AutoStakkert! is for
Planetary imager
Buy
This is the tool for turning a Jupiter or Mars video into one sharp picture.
Moon and Sun imager
Buy
Surface mode and a grid of alignment points handle a big disc or a field of craters.
Beginner on a budget
Buy
It costs nothing; expect a learning curve on the first evening.
Deep-sky imager
Skip
For long exposures of galaxies and nebulae, use Siril or DeepSkyStacker.
Mac user
Skip
It is Windows software; Wine is the only route on a Mac.
Three alternatives I have reviewed
- RegiStax Free as well, with wavelet sharpening built in; where I started 77/100 Free Read the review
- ASIStudio Free from ZWO, with ASIVideoStack for planetary videos 79/100 Free Read the review
- SharpCap Captures the planetary videos you stack; free, or Pro for a yearly fee 95/100 £14 Read the review
Questions and more about this review
Reviewed by
Damon Scotting
The Telescope Man Verified
BSc (Hons) Physics with Astrophysics and Cosmology, Loughborough University PGCE / QTS, University of Nottingham
About Damon About Damon Damon Scotting is The Telescope Man. He holds a BSc (Hons) in Physics with Astrophysics and Cosmology from Loughborough University and a PGCE with QTS from the University of Nottingham, and taught physics in secondary schools before becoming an astronomy creator. He is a contributing writer for BBC Sky at Night Magazine and the author of 42 Wonders of Our Night Sky, and his photograph of the galaxy M100 with the dwarf planet Ceres was Highly Commended in the Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2024 competition run by Royal Observatory Greenwich. He has appeared on the BBC's Blue Peter. More than 750,000 people follow his astronomy channels on YouTube, Instagram and TikTok, and he has reviewed more than 140 telescopes, mounts, cameras, filters and accessories hands-on for this site. More about Damon · How I test · Damon's book
I review all kinds of gear: most of it I buy, some is gifted and some is loaned, and all of it is reviewed the same way. How this site is funded
Six questions, answered
Questions about the AutoStakkert!
Reviewed 2 November 2026 ·Updated 2 November 2026
I review all kinds of gear. Most of it I buy, some is gifted and some is loaned, and all of it is reviewed the same way: no company sees or approves a review before it is published. Some shop links are affiliate links: I earn a commission when you buy through them, at no extra cost to you. How this site is funded
- Is AutoStakkert! free? Yes, for private, non-commercial use, and for schools, libraries and charities. A business needs to register and pay. The specifications and the comparison table ↓
- Which version should I download? 4.0.13 is the newest build, labelled a beta that might be less stable. 4.0.11 is the one the site calls reasonably stable. My screenshots are from 4.0.13. The specifications and the comparison table ↓
- Does AutoStakkert! run on a Mac? Not natively. It is Windows software; the site says it runs on macOS and Linux through Wine, with no native versions planned. The specifications and the comparison table ↓
- Does it colour and sharpen the image? It can save a lightly sharpened copy, but the real finishing happens afterwards. My eclipse stack was coloured and sharpened after AutoStakkert!, as the before and after shows. The raw stacks against the finished images ↓
- AutoStakkert! or RegiStax? Both are free. The specifications and the comparison table ↓
- What have I not tested on the AutoStakkert!? I stacked my own solar eclipse video for this page. I have not timed it against other stackers, and I have not tested its drizzle or RGB align options.