Celestron f/6.3 Reducer-Corrector review: my first reducer
Where does it rank on our leaderboard
| Rank | Accessory | Stars for Your Buck | Recorded UK price |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GEMINI EAF | 100 out of 100 | £42 |
| 2 | Generic Dew Heater | 93 out of 100 | £9 |
| 12 | Celestron 8-24mm Eyepiece | 82 out of 100 | £99 |
| 13 | ASIAIR Plus 256GB | 81 out of 100 | £399 |
| 30 | Celestron 0.63x Reducer | 62 out of 100 | £165 |
| 33 | ZWO EAF | 51 out of 100 | £199 |
| 35 | PowerMate 5x Barlow | 47 out of 100 | £255 |
| 45 | SKY ROVER 2x54 Binoculars | 28 out of 100 | £139 |
| 46 | 365 Solar Telescope Cover | 5 out of 100 | £73 |
Contents
- 01 Where does it rank on our leaderboard
- 02 Specifications and features
- 03 Should you buy it?
- 04 Questions and more about this review
In 30 seconds
Stars for Your Buck 62/100
Written 26 Sep 2026 Updated 26 Sep 2026
- Rank
- #30 of 46 accessories
- Verdict
- Worth a look
Written by Damon Scotting 2 min read
Buy it if
- You own a standard Celestron SCT (C5, C6, C8, C9.25, C11 or C14) and want Celestron's own reducer with a stated working distance.
- You would rather buy from a UK or US dealer than wait on an AliExpress delivery.
Skip it if
- You own an EdgeHD: Celestron lists this reducer as not compatible.
- You want the lowest price: a generic f/6.3 reducer costs well under half as much.
It was the first reducer I ever used on my Celestron C8, and I think it's really good.
Specifications and features
| Celestron 0.63x Reducer reviewed #30 of 46 | |
|---|---|
| Recorded UK price | £165 |
| Type | Reducer-corrector for Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes |
| Model | 94175 |
| Reduction | 0.63x: focal length and focal ratio cut by 37% (f/10 to f/6.3) |
| Fits | Celestron C5, C6, C8, C9.25, C11 and C14 |
| Not for | EdgeHD optical tubes |
| Working distance | 105 mm from the rear, camera-side threads |
| Size | 56 mm across, 34 mm long |
| Weight | 122 g (4.3 oz) |
| Coatings | Fully multi-coated |
| Housing | Machined aluminium |
Should you buy it?
62/100 Stars for Your Buck
Pros
- I have used it on a lot of my earlier setups.
- Celestron states it cuts the focal length and focal ratio of its SCTs by 37%, from f/10 to f/6.3.
- Fits the Celestron C5, C6, C8, C9.25, C11 and C14.
- A stated working distance: 105 mm from the rear, camera-side threads, so the spacing is not guesswork.
- Small and light: 56 mm across, 34 mm long and 122 g.
Cons
- Not compatible with EdgeHD optical tubes.
- £165 at First Light Optics, about two and a half times a generic 0.63x reducer: the reason I lean to the generic ones.
- The full 0.63x holds at its working distance only: the generic reducer on my C5 reached 0.80x at the spacing I used.
I'm a big fan of the generic reducers over the Celestron or Meade ones, simply because they're cheaper.
Three alternatives I have reviewed
- Generic 0.63x Reducer The generic f/6.3 reducer I used on my C5 for the Needle Galaxy, the Pinwheel and M 13, and the cheaper kind I lean to 88/100 £54 Read the review
- Celestron 8″ EdgeHD 0.7x Reducer For an 8 inch EdgeHD, which this reducer does not fit 44/100 £429 Read the review
- Celestron 11″ EdgeHD 0.7x Reducer For a C11 EdgeHD: its own matched 0.7x reducer 42/100 £855 Read the review
Questions and more about this review
Reviewed by
Damon Scotting
The Telescope Man Verified
BSc (Hons) Physics with Astrophysics and Cosmology, Loughborough University PGCE / QTS, University of Nottingham
About Damon About Damon Damon Scotting is The Telescope Man. He holds a BSc (Hons) in Physics with Astrophysics and Cosmology from Loughborough University and a PGCE with QTS from the University of Nottingham, and taught physics in secondary schools before becoming an astronomy creator. He is a contributing writer for BBC Sky at Night Magazine and the author of 42 Wonders of Our Night Sky, and his photograph of the galaxy M100 with the dwarf planet Ceres was Highly Commended in the Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2024 competition run by Royal Observatory Greenwich. He has appeared on the BBC's Blue Peter. More than 750,000 people follow his astronomy channels on YouTube, Instagram and TikTok, and he has reviewed more than 140 telescopes, mounts, cameras, filters and accessories hands-on for this site. More about Damon · How I test · Damon's book
I review all kinds of gear: most of it I buy, some is gifted and some is loaned, and all of it is reviewed the same way. How this site is funded
Five questions, answered
Questions about the Celestron 0.63x Reducer
Written 26 September 2026 ·Updated 26 September 2026
I review all kinds of gear. Most of it I buy, some is gifted and some is loaned, and all of it is reviewed the same way: no company sees or approves a review before it is published. Some shop links are affiliate links: I earn a commission when you buy through them, at no extra cost to you. How this site is funded
- Does the Celestron f/6.3 reducer fit an EdgeHD? No. Celestron lists it as not compatible with EdgeHD tubes: each EdgeHD has a field flattener in its baffle tube and needs the 0.7x reducer matched to its aperture. The specifications ↓
- What spacing does it need? Celestron gives a working distance of 105 mm from the rear, camera-side threads. The generic 0.63x reducer on my C5 reached only 0.80x at the spacing I used, so plan the distance to your sensor. The specifications ↓
- Celestron or the generic 0.63x reducer? I have used both. Celestron's was the first reducer I ever used, on my C8, and I think it is really good; a generic one gave me the Needle Galaxy, the Pinwheel and M 13 on my C5. I lean to the generic ones because they are cheaper, though Celestron's own states the working distance and weight that the generic listing leaves out. The specifications ↓
- How much does the Celestron f/6.3 reducer cost? The prices I recorded: £165 at First Light Optics (UK), awaiting stock; $200 at Agena Astro (US), in stock; $113 at AliExpress (STARRYSEA Official Store), Global, listed. A record, not a live price The verdict, the readers and the sellers ↓
- What have I not tested on the f/6.3 Reducer-Corrector? I have not measured the reduction Celestron's reducer gave me, and none of my images through it is on this page.