TeSeek 11 review: the 1.3 kg harmonic mount I grab first
Where does it rank on our leaderboard
| Rank | Mount | Stars for Your Buck | Recorded UK price |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TeSeek NanoTracker | 100 out of 100 | £52 |
| 2 | ClearSky ST25 | 94 out of 100 | £1,259 |
| 3 | TeSeek 11 | 93 out of 100 | £252 |
| 5 | JUWEI-14 | 89 out of 100 | £632 |
| 9 | ZWO AM5 | 58 out of 100 | £2,099 |
| 11 | ClearSky ST17 Mini | 56 out of 100 | £712 |
| 16 | ZWO AM3 | 34 out of 100 | £1,599 |
| 17 | Sky-Watcher GTi Mount | 33 out of 100 | £435 |
| 18 | Celestron CG5 | 24 out of 100 | £299 |
Contents
- 01 Where does it rank on our leaderboard
- 02 Specifications and features
- 03 In the hand
- 04 From the review video
- 05 What would you put on it?
- 06 How well does it guide?
- 07 What is it for? In my words
- 08 What it captured
- 09 Raw against finished
- 10 Watch the review
- 11 Every row of my showdown, and the readings behind each one
- 12 Should you buy it?
- 13 Questions and more about this review
In 30 seconds
Stars for Your Buck 93/100
Reviewed 30 Aug 2025 Updated 24 Sep 2026
- Rank
- #3 of 18 mounts
- Verdict
- Damon's pick
Written by Damon Scotting 8 min read
Buy it if
- You want a go-to harmonic mount for a small refractor or a camera lens without spending four figures.
- You want a mount light enough for a backpack that runs from a USB power bank.
- Your rig stays under about 4 kg and you drive it from an ASIAIR, NINA or SharpCap.
Skip it if
- Your rig weighs more than about 4 kg: I treat 4 kg as its hard limit, below the 5 kg on the listing.
- You want a mount that feels solid and metal: this one feels light and a little flimsy, and its motor cables can work loose.
- You want everything in the box: it needs a latitude adjuster and a tripod.
“Pound for pound, I don't think there's a better telescope mount on the market than this.”
Specifications and features
Against the mounts I have reviewed
Compare with
| TeSeek 11 reviewed #3 of 18 | JUWEI-14 #5 of 18 | TeSeek 17 #6 of 18 | ZWO AM3N #13 of 18 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recorded UK price | £252 | £632 | £536 | £1,599 |
| Stars for Your Buck | 93/100 | 89/100 | 88/100 | 46/100 |
| Average guiding RMS | 0.92 arcsec | 0.98 arcsec | 0.85 arcsec | Unknown |
| Best target in my showdown | 0.56 arcsec, Andromeda | 0.77 arcsec, Veil | 0.45 arcsec, Heart | not in the showdown |
| Type | Harmonic drive go-to equatorial mount, both axes | Harmonic drive go-to equatorial mount | Harmonic drive go-to equatorial mount | Harmonic drive go-to equatorial mount |
| No-counterweight payload | 5 kg (TeSeek); 4 kg is my working limit | 8 kg | 13.5 kg | 8 kg |
| Counterweight payload | not recorded | 13 kg | 18 kg | 13 kg |
| Mount weight | 1.3 kg | 3.4 kg | 3.2 kg | 4.1 kg |
| Periodic error | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Within ±15 arcseconds, measured curve supplied |
| Gearing | Harmonic reducers on both axes | Harmonic (strain-wave) drive | Two size-17 harmonic gearboxes, 400:1 on both axes | Harmonic drive |
| Control | OnStep: phone app over Bluetooth or WiFi, ASIAIR, NINA and SharpCap | OnStep: ASIAIR, NINA, hand controller | WiFi and Bluetooth app; ASIAIR | WiFi and Bluetooth app, ASIAIR, ASCOM, INDI |
| Power | 5 V, 2 A from a USB power bank | 12 V DC | 12 V, 2 A | 12 V DC |
| Tripod or pier | 38 mm Arca clamp underneath; a latitude adjuster and a tripod needed | 3/8 inch thread | Metal latitude base included; no tripod | Head only; ZWO sells it with the TC40 tripod |
| In the box | The mount | Mount head | The mount; no tripod | AM3N; foam case; hand controller and 2 m cable; 2 m USB-B cable; 1 m USB-C cable; PE report; guide; M6 hex key |
In the hand
From the review video
Frames from my videos
The TeSeek 11 on the turntable in daylight
The saddle in the hand
The RedCat 51 rig under a full Moon
The built-in laser on the sky
What would you put on it?
The TeSeek 11's 5 kg rating under a rig you can change part by part, then the same rig on six other mounts
How well does it guide?
Seven mounts, eight rows, the same 50 mm guide scopes and ASI120 cameras on ASIAIR units, four targets on one night in my garden; the AM5N ran in both groups
“Here's a 10x sped up view of 7 minutes worth of guiding when looking almost straight up at the North America Nebula during a full moon. Overall, very good readings. I think the highest RMS value reached was 1.24.”
“Throughout the entire night, the mount never went above 2.00 in terms of guiding, and I think on average its RMS would have been just about 1.”
“Imagine being the worst performer with an average total RMS of 0.9: I would take that as my mount in a heartbeat.”
“Hang on a second, look at this guy: the tiniest and lightest of the bunch only just misses out on a medal.”
“When I did my guiding tests on the two generations, I noticed that the generation one was still performing considerably better than the generation two.”
About this visualisation
This visualisation illustrates the guiding figures on this page: the published RMS for each target and the ASIAIR readings from my showdown. It is not the TeSeek 11’s precise recorded tracking, and the moving traces are drawn to those figures, not replayed from the mount.
What is it for? In my words
Five things it is for
Runs on an ASIAIR
It works directly with your ASIAIR. It uses OnStep software like a lot of third-party mounts, meaning you can easily control the mount using the free OnStep app on your mobile device.
A laser for the pole
I point it at the North Star without even doing a polar alignment, hit go-to, start tracking and get some really good images.
Power from a power bank
The entire mount can be powered by a 5 volt 2 amp power bank.
The latitude adjuster you add
You need to also buy a latitude adjustment mount in order to align it with your Pole Star, which for many of us is Polaris.
A 4.11 kg rig
I've decided to give it a baptism of fire and mount my narrowband guiding telescope setup. Overall this telescope rig weighs 4.11 kg, which isn't too far off the max recommended payload.
What it captured
Six targets
NGC 7000 North America Nebula, ASI585MC Air
- Integration
- 3 h 45 min (75 x 180 s)
- Field
- 3.4 x 1.9 degrees
- Telescope
- Askar 50P
- Camera
- ZWO ASI585MC Air
- Mount
- TeSeek 11
- Target
- NGC 7000 North America Nebula
- Type
- Emission nebula
- Location
- Bortle 6.8 (in my garden)
NGC 6960 and NGC 6992 Veil Nebula, ASI585MC Air
- Integration
- 48 min (16 x 180 s)
- Field
- 3.4 x 1.9 degrees
- Telescope
- Askar 50P
- Camera
- ZWO ASI585MC Air
- Mount
- TeSeek 11
- Target
- NGC 6960 and NGC 6992 Veil Nebula
- Type
- Supernova remnant
- Location
- Bortle 6.8 (in my garden)
M 13 Hercules Globular Cluster, ASI585MC Air
- Integration
- 1 h 57 min (39 x 180 s)
- Field
- 3.4 x 1.9 degrees
- Telescope
- Askar 50P
- Camera
- ZWO ASI585MC Air
- Mount
- TeSeek 11
- Target
- M 13 Hercules Globular Cluster
- Type
- Globular cluster
- Location
- Bortle 6.8 (in my garden)
M 51 Whirlpool Galaxy, ASI585MC Air
- Integration
- 1 h (20 x 180 s)
- Field
- 3.4 x 1.9 degrees
- Telescope
- Askar 50P
- Camera
- ZWO ASI585MC Air
- Mount
- TeSeek 11
- Target
- M 51 Whirlpool Galaxy
- Type
- Spiral galaxy
- Location
- Bortle 6.8 (in my garden)
Markarian's Chain, ASI585MC Air
- Integration
- 1 h (20 x 180 s)
- Field
- 3.4 x 1.9 degrees
- Telescope
- Askar 50P
- Camera
- ZWO ASI585MC Air
- Mount
- TeSeek 11
- Target
- Markarian's Chain
- Type
- Galaxy cluster
- Location
- Bortle 6.8 (in my garden)
Leo Triplet, ASI585MC Air
- Integration
- 2 h 12 min (44 x 180 s)
- Field
- 3.4 x 1.9 degrees
- Telescope
- Askar 50P
- Camera
- ZWO ASI585MC Air
- Mount
- TeSeek 11
- Target
- Leo Triplet
- Type
- Galaxy group
- Location
- Bortle 6.8 (in my garden)
Raw against finished
Watch the review
The 4 targets, the raw combined stack against my finished image, each with its integration, the camera and the palette:
- NGC 7000 North America Nebula: 3 h 45 min (75 x 180 s) of light, ASI585MC Air, the raw combined stack with one automatic stretch
- NGC 6960 and NGC 6992 Veil Nebula: 48 min (16 x 180 s) of light, ASI585MC Air, the raw combined stack with one automatic stretch
- M 13 Hercules Globular Cluster: 1 h 57 min (39 x 180 s) of light, ASI585MC Air, the raw combined stack with one automatic stretch
- M 51 Whirlpool Galaxy: 1 h (20 x 180 s) of light, ASI585MC Air, the raw combined stack with one automatic stretch
I tried a £299 Telescope mount?! Surprisingly GOOD! (TeSeek 11 mount) · published 30 August 2025 · 8:14 · Watch on YouTube · 24,851 views, 861 likes on 2 Oct 2026
Jump to
- 0:19 What is it?
- 0:50 3 key points
- 2:08 Extra gear
- 2:34 GOAT setup
- 3:33 Guiding results
- 4:36 Seven minutes on the North America Nebula
- 5:06 Guiding on the Andromeda Galaxy
- 5:52 The Heart Nebula
- 6:46 Improvements
Transcript of the review video 1,602 words · 11 chapters · searchable
Press a time stamp to play from there.
0:19 What is it?
0:20 Harmonic drive mounts are one of the best things to happen to astrophotography in the last 10 years. 0:23 They can carry unbelievable payloads in spite of weighing less than a ginger cat. 0:29 So I guess it kind of makes sense that the most popular variety of these witchcraft mounts cost more than $2000. 0:33 But today I'm going to be reviewing a mount capable of carrying payloads up to 5kg for only £299. 0:38 This is the TeSeek Mini Dual Axis 11 mount. 0:45 I've attached a direct link to the product in the description below for you to explore for yourself but the first three important things to note in this video are.
0:50 3 key points
0:52 Number one, it works directly with your ASIAIR. 0:52 It uses OnStep software like a lot of third party mount, meaning you can easily control the mount using the free OnStep app via your mobile device. 1:01 Number 2, it has an integrated laser pointer and the entire mount can be powered by a 5 volt 2 amp power bank. 1:05 And number 3, you need to also buy a latitude adjustment mount in order to align it with your Pole Star, which for many of us is Polaris. 1:16 You need this and a suitable tripod to go with the mount. 1:19 So before we test the guiding, let's first address the hidden costs. 1:19 I'm a bit of a stickler when it comes to the real cost of telescope gear so how much will this mount really cost you? 1:23 Well as of the middle of August the mount itself is actually priced at 285 pounds 99 pence. 1:34 There's a 26 pound 87p shipping fee and for about two weeks every month AliExpress runs a variety of promo codes and special offers that mean you can save a small fortune on their products. 1:44 So all in all an absolute bargain, I think even at at £399, a mount of these specifications would still be good value. 1:54 Especially since the cheapest go-to mount I can think of is the Sky-Watcher GTi, which is a giant in terms of weight and size in comparison to this mount. 1:58 It also requires the use of counterweights. 2:02 At its cheapest here in the UK, it's £469. 2:02 But one thing the Skywatcher mount doesn't need is a latitude adjustment.
2:08 Extra gear
2:08 Fortunately, we can purchase one for just £45. 2:12 And we also need a sturdy but lightweight tripod mount to complete our setup. 2:17 I went for the SVBONY SV225T tripod that was available on Amazon for next day delivery and it cost £66.49. 2:22 Meaning in order to properly utilise these budget friendly mounts you still need to spend another £100. 2:28 So yeah, I feel it's really important to mention that beforehand, but otherwise this is it. 2:32 This is the cheapest harmonic drive setup I've ever seen.
2:34 GOAT setup
2:37 You can mount your phone, your camera or your telescope up to 5kg. 2:41 Now to put it to the test, I've decided to give it a baptism of fire and mount my narrowband guiding telescope setup. 2:46 Who would have thought baptism of fire meant RedCat 51 telescope. 2:52 Overall this telescope rig weighs 4.11kg which isn't too far off the max recommended payload. 2:58 I'm using an ASI533MM Pro with a 7x2 inch ZWO filter wheel and a RedCat 51 f/3.5 with a 50mm guide scope and ASI120MM guiding camera, all connected to an ASI air that's sitting awkwardly on a little tray that keeps the tripod legs at a fixed distance apart. 3:20 Alright, time for the moment of truth, how well does it guide? 3:23 As you can probably notice in the background, it's a full moon tonight and I've got my beloved fairy lights cranked all the way up to 100%, simulating the brightness of 10 billion suns in my garden. 3:31 All because I just love light pollution, I love the hustle of being an astrophotographer who doesn't benefit from Bortle 1 skies.
3:33 Guiding results
3:40 In fact last night I asked my landlord to increase my rent. 3:40 That's how much I believe in my grind. 3:45 So with that in mind I roughly polar aligned my telescope rig to Polaris using the built-in laser and then told it to go find the North America Nebula and start guiding. 3:54 And it did so without a fuss. 3:54 What we're hoping for here in terms of RMS with this mount is less than a total of 3.00. 3:58 If it's less than 3 then I'd class it as you get what you pay for. 4:03 If it's less than 2 then I'd say that's good value for money. 4:08 And if it's consistently less than one, then I'm going to buy about 10 of these and donate them to as many astronomical societies here in the UK as possible. 4:15 I've sped things up throughout the guiding process so that you can see how well it does over the course of an hour whilst guiding during a full moon, pointed at multiple different locations in our night sky. 4:24 I've also snapped a quick 30 second exposure here to showcase the star shapes. 4:28 I find this a little harder to assess in monochrome. 4:30 When shooting in colour it feels like it's easier to tell if something's bad or good, but generally these star shapes look really good.
4:36 Seven minutes on the North America Nebula
4:36 So here's a 10x sped up view of 7 minutes worth of guiding when looking almost straight up at the North America Nebula during a full moon. 4:41 Overall, very good readings. 4:41 I think the highest RMS value reached was 1.24. 4:47 I'm pretty sure these are the default ASIAIR guiding settings, so you could hyper-tune them to specifically suit the pulse readings from this mount to improve it even further. 4:57 But straight out of the box, this is a very good start. 4:57 However, the North America Nebula is directly overhead and easy to see. 5:02 I'm now going to slew the mount towards a more difficult target, the Andromeda Galaxy.
5:06 Guiding on the Andromeda Galaxy
5:07 It's only more difficult because there's less nearby stars and it's lower in the horizon, but this is 13 minutes worth of guiding whilst pointed at M31. 5:17 You can actually see it showing up here on the left through the guide camera as this little faint fuzzy blob. 5:21 And once again I think these are some semi-decent numbers. 5:26 I was moving around a lot whilst guiding this time but I don't think that's had too strong of an influence on it. 5:30 This was during the peak of the Perseids meteor shower so I did briefly turn off the fairy lights to try and get a better look at them. 5:33 But it's never easy to spot meteors during a full moon, let's face it. 5:40 The stars once again seemed fine, the image looks rubbish no thanks to the moon, and there was one spot where I thought I could see the stars trailing indicating poor guiding for a 300 second exposure, but it was actually a binary star.
5:52 The Heart Nebula
5:53 To finish things off I slewed over to the Heart Nebula, which will have been arguably one of the most difficult areas to guide tonight. 5:56 It's first attempt to centre the object in it's field of view was almost perfect, and it only took 2 in total before it had it perfectly aligned. 6:05 I've sped the recording of this guiding video up to 40 times because I think you get the gist, although if you're a hyper analytical astrophotographer feel free to change the playback of this video to 0.25 times for a more thorough viewing experience. 6:18 Throughout the entire night, the mount never went above 2.00 in terms of guiding, and I think on average its RMS would have been just about 1. 6:22 Which according to the product description on AliExpress is not too far off that estimation of 0.6 to 1, supposedly using a 130mm reflector telescope. 6:32 I've attached a link to the mount in the description below by the way, but bear in mind the price and availability of these products fluctuate wildly day to day. 6:40 Keep your eye out for these regular AliExpress promotions. 6:45 I could have made the payload of this setup a lot less, particularly by replacing the huge filter wheel, guide scope, and swapping for a non-cooled IMX533 sensor camera like the Player One Saturn camera, and an SVBONY filter drawer.
6:46 Improvements
6:57 I'm in the process at the moment of reviewing the Askar 80ED, which is a surprisingly light telescope that's also one of the most affordable quality refractors on the market. 7:05 I reckon it could make a very good partner for this mount, so expect a budget setup video featuring the two in the near future. 7:12 Speaking of future videos, I'm testing a lot of these quirky mounts from AliExpress, I say a lot, I basically mean all of them.
7:13 Future videos
7:18 I'm making a mega review video in which I compare the tracking data of all of these mounts pointed at the same target at the same time versus the values achieved from the most expensive and popular name brand mounts, such as the AM5N. 7:30 At the time of filming this, I'm still perhaps the biggest fan of the JUWEI-14 mounts. 7:34 In fact, a his versus hers telescope comparison video is on the way. 7:41 I'm hoping to pair it with complementing reviews the new Askar 91F and the Askar 60F telescopes. 7:43 So in the meantime if you want to help support the channel and the future production of videos and series like these then make sure you like the video and subscribe. 7:52 The links to all of the products and services mentioned in today's video are located in the description below. 7:55 Thanks for watching, I'm Damon Scotting, and this was Astronomical.
8:04 Outro
8:13 you
Check out more videos on the TeSeek 11
This £299 Telescope Mount Just Beat the £2,260 Mount…
16 Oct 2025
The $299 Telescope so GOOD, I Bought THREE of Them?!
1 May 2026
Every row of my showdown, and the readings behind each one
| Mount | Stars for Your Buck | Andromeda | Heart | North America | Veil | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 ClearSky ST25 | 94/100 | 0.66″ | 0.69″ | 0.48″ | 0.80″ | 0.66″ |
| 2 EM31 Pro | 52/100 | 0.91″ | 0.61″ | 0.68″ | 0.73″ | 0.73″ |
| 3 TeSeek 17 | 88/100 | 1.19″ | 0.45″ | 0.83″ | 0.93″ | 0.85″ |
| 4 TeSeek 11 | 93/100 | 0.56″ | 1.47″ | 0.90″ | 0.76″ | 0.92″ |
| 5 JUWEI-14 | 89/100 | 1.37″ | 0.91″ | 0.88″ | 0.77″ | 0.98″ |
| 6 ZWO AM5N (second group) | 71/100 | 1.68″ | 0.85″ | 0.66″ | 0.78″ | 0.99″ |
| 7 ClearSky ST17 Mini | 56/100 | 1.17″ | 0.86″ | 0.77″ | 1.56″ | 1.09″ |
| 8 ZWO AM5N (first group) | 71/100 | 1.53″ | 1.28″ | 0.74″ | 0.86″ | 1.10″ |
TeSeek 11
0.92″ average, 4th of 8
93/100 Stars for Your Buck
| Target | Readings | Mean | Range | RA | DEC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda | 27 | 0.56″ | 0.40″ to 0.79″ | 0.42″ | 0.31″ |
| Heart | 17 | 1.57″ | 1.35″ to 1.79″ | 1.22″ | 0.99″ |
| North America | 11 | 0.92″ | 0.76″ to 1.19″ | 0.69″ | 0.59″ |
| Veil | 16 | 0.76″ | 0.53″ to 1.31″ | 0.47″ | 0.42″ |
Should you buy it?
93/100 Stars for Your Buck
Pros
- Up against some of the big popular mounts, the TeSeek 11 did incredibly well, coming out on top in some of my tests.
- It is the easiest mount to grab and plonk outside, and the built-in laser is a very handy little feature.
- “I roughly polar aligned my telescope rig to Polaris using the built-in laser and then told it to go find the North America Nebula and start guiding. And it did so without a fuss.”
- “There was even a point during our observations where it was guiding at less than 0.4 RMS, which is the last thing I expected from such a lightweight and flimsy mount.”
- “This is the cheapest harmonic drive setup I've ever seen. You can mount your phone, your camera or your telescope up to 5 kg.”
Cons
- It feels relatively flimsy: with the Askar 80ED on top I was genuinely concerned by how much it wobbled.
- Keep the payload to about 4 kg and you will be absolutely fine. The listing says 5 kg, but 4 kg is the hard limit I hit.
- The cables between the motors are loose and a little flimsy, and they can work loose when you move it about.
I like to think this is the beginning of the future for affordable tracking mounts.
Who the TeSeek 11 is for
First imaging mount on a budget
Buy
A go-to harmonic mount that guides well, for a small refractor such as the Askar 50P that took the captures on this page.
Travelling imager
Buy
At 1.3 kg, with a built-in laser and power from a USB power bank, it is the quickest mount to set up.
ASIAIR user
Buy
It runs OnStep, so an ASIAIR drives it and guides it.
Owner of an 80 mm refractor with a full imaging train
Skip
Rigs near 4 kg are its limit; my recommendation is the JUWEI-14 for more headroom.
Phone or camera-lens beginner
Skip
My recommendation is the TeSeek NanoTracker, a pocket tracker for a fraction of the price.
Owner of a heavy scope
Skip
My recommendation is the TeSeek 17, rated for 13.5 kg without a counterweight on my card.
Three alternatives I have reviewed
- TeSeek NanoTracker A pocket tracker for a phone or a camera and lens 100/100 £52 Read the review
- JUWEI-14 8 kg without a counterweight and 13 kg with, fifth in my showdown 89/100 £632 Read the review
- TeSeek 17 13.5 kg without a counterweight, third in my showdown 88/100 £536 Read the review
Questions and more about this review
Reviewed by
Damon Scotting
The Telescope Man Verified
BSc (Hons) Physics with Astrophysics and Cosmology, Loughborough University PGCE / QTS, University of Nottingham
About Damon About Damon Damon Scotting is The Telescope Man. He holds a BSc (Hons) in Physics with Astrophysics and Cosmology from Loughborough University and a PGCE with QTS from the University of Nottingham, and taught physics in secondary schools before becoming an astronomy creator. He is a contributing writer for BBC Sky at Night Magazine and the author of 42 Wonders of Our Night Sky, and his photograph of the galaxy M100 with the dwarf planet Ceres was Highly Commended in the Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2024 competition run by Royal Observatory Greenwich. He has appeared on the BBC's Blue Peter. More than 750,000 people follow his astronomy channels on YouTube, Instagram and TikTok, and he has reviewed more than 140 telescopes, mounts, cameras, filters and accessories hands-on for this site. More about Damon · How I test · Damon's book
I review all kinds of gear: most of it I buy, some is gifted and some is loaned, and all of it is reviewed the same way. How this site is funded
Six questions, answered
Questions about the TeSeek 11
Reviewed 30 August 2025 ·Updated 24 September 2026
I review all kinds of gear. Most of it I buy, some is gifted and some is loaned, and all of it is reviewed the same way: no company sees or approves a review before it is published. Shop links marked Ad are affiliate links: I earn a commission when you buy through them, at no extra cost to you. How this site is funded
- How much can the TeSeek 11 carry? TeSeek rate it at about 5 kg without a counterweight. I treat 4 kg as the hard limit; my RedCat 51 narrowband rig weighed 4.11 kg and guided through the night. What would you put on it? ↓
- How well does the TeSeek 11 guide? In my seven-mount showdown it averaged 0.92 arcsec total RMS over four targets, fourth of eight rows, and it was the best of all eight on the Andromeda Galaxy at 0.56. How well does it guide? ↓
- What else do you need for the TeSeek 11? A latitude adjuster to tilt it to your latitude, a sturdy tripod (I used an SVBONY SV225T) and a 5 V, 2 A USB power bank. What is it for? In my words ↓
- TeSeek 11 generation one or generation two? TeSeek's listing for generation two says it is 200 g lighter, hides the right ascension cable inside the shell, adds a 15 cm counterweight rod and uses synchronous-wheel harmonics with a 12 V DC input. This page reviews generation one, and my guiding readings are all from generation one. How well does it guide? ↓
- TeSeek 11 or TeSeek NanoTracker? The TeSeek 11 can go to and track targets and carries a small telescope; the NanoTracker is set and forget, for a phone or a camera and lens. The verdict, the readers and the sellers ↓
- Which telescopes suit the TeSeek 11? Small refractors: I have run the RedCat 51 with a cooled mono camera and filter wheel, the Askar 80ED, and the Askar 50P that took every capture on this page. What I captured ↓